THE UNTRODDED PATH
When the delegates knew how to do, but never knew when or what to do



After three days of mind-boggling sessions, the Executive Board was rather a tad bit disheartened, as they were not seeing sensible analysis and critical thinking. So, to throw light on this, the vice chair himself, Srijan Chakraborty vounteered to give an ellaboarately carved demonstration. After taking Rohini Godbole’s portfolio, he took to going at the back of the committee. Delegates wittnessed how he raised his placard to get a chance to voice his ideas and were awestruck at his debating manners. He began paving the way by stating that in Universities, a bountiful number of students have to just shift themselves from colleges to coaching instituites, and sit there for hours together, burning their freetime and the midnight oil to pass an entrance exam; if they do not, it is simply over for them. 

After this amount of over-loading pressure, it is brought to light that only 7 percent of the engineers, “produced” by many prestigious instituitions, are eligible for employment. What about the other 93 percent? Well, the contribute to India’s 31 million unemployed. He also aptly mentioned that there is no criterion for sorting in universities, and quality of students is not implied, with that high amount of fees they have to cough out. 

After the speech he made, there were, as expected, queries from Mr. Javadekar. Being the concerned Human Resources Development Minister, he asked how Godbole’s idealistic points would be implied in the country, and how he would there not be any protest put forward by people? Godbole replied, “It is not about legality, it is all about morality”. Also, he asked for the exam paper pattern to change, so that instituitions would not teach their students in accordance with the same. 

Past this, the chair asked Suchita De, why instituitions conduct entrance exams. She replied, saying that they want to filter the best. To this, Javadekar gave his much-needed comment that there is a huge population of students, and they want to check eligibility. That is when Anil Sahasrabudhe mentioned that they needed to improve extra-currcular and vocational courses. Lastly, when asked why students will not protest on such a change, Tanveer Sait aptly replied, “if this is happening for the betterment of the students, and they would not protest for this.” 

At the end of the day, there have to gather solutions. Everyone hopes that Srijan inscribed the right path, for the others to follow.

Indian Express
CRESI
beat





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The last session

United States; Divided Thoughts