A Session from Delegates point of view


discussing and perfecting the working papers 

A few delegates were asked about their point of view of the first session of the day and here is the session when one puts themselves in the shoes of a delegate: -
·       The delegate of Afghanistan shared his views with us about his point of view about the previous session. He commented that the session was really productive and seemed really spellbinding. He found the discussion of the working paper really informative as while discussing, the delegates perfected and reflected their flaws on the working paper. He strongly believes that rough drafts are supposed to have mistakes and should be corrected. He also feels that the changes to be brought in the government of his country should be enforced with the help of the UN as it is an international committee.
  • ·       According to the delegate of India, the session was pretty good, as the he was enlightened by the working papers drafted by the other blocs and obviously the working paper of his own bloc too. He would like to implement the changes in his country after receiving authorisation from the higher official and also after viewing its advantages and disadvantages. This also includes the suggestions and viewpoints of other delegates.
  • ·       The delegate of Venezuela strongly believes that the session effectively threw light on many meaningful solutions provided by the two blocs. She also believes that the setting a subordinate body of the UNSC would be a bold and effective move in the mitigating terrors like cybercrime. She also assures that Venezuela would be an active member of the subordinate body if it is introduced and would readily comply with the rules of the body.

·       The delegate of Australia states that the committee has made immense progress today and at the fact that they have successfully come up with resolutions. “Honestly this is the first time in a committee that the delegate has been in resolution that has been defeated. the working papers had many errors which were rectified resulting in one resolution. “However, he mentions that he is not satisfied to the answers of the points of information given to him.” Australia has a goal to achieve i.e. stronger cyber terrorism prevention cooperation and prosecution with a particular focus on the Indo-Pacific region. In order to achieve this step should be taken. For instance, awareness about cyber terrorism in the Indo-Pacific region and region, assist Indo-Pacific countries to strengthen their cyber terrorism mitigating legislature, deliver an anti cyber terrorism law enforcement and prosecution capacity building in the Indo-pacific and to enhance a diplomatic dialogue and international information sharing on cyber terrorism.
  • ·       The delegate of China states that the session was mind blowing and has no words to describe it. He states that the session allowed all the delegates to explore others point of view and he also says that the working papers were really fun to work on. And to answer the point of information was quite tricky.
  • ·       The delegate of Brazil mentions that the session was really explanatory as the delegates were really communicative and showed great interest which reflected in their working papers and during the point of information. The method of enforcing changes would include speaking and convincing the higher officials and making it strict in their nation  

From the following interviews the session seems to be really informative, and accountable and proves that the countries are working hard to find one standard solution to end cybercrime. on the whole all delegates strongly believe that these changes can be brought about by convincing the higher authorities and seeing the pros and cons.
BY ,
XINHUA, DISEC
[ANALYSIS]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The last session

United States; Divided Thoughts